@greg0205
You stupid, dishonest cunt.
If the US was a country with *only* white folks, it would have 196,92 million citizens and cops murdered 457 of those citizens last year. That's ,00023% of the citizenry murdered by law enforcement in 2020.
If the US was a country with *only* black folks, it would have 42,66 million citizens and cops murdered 214 of those citizens last year. That's ,00050% of the citizenry murdered by law enforcement in 2020.
Last I checked, ,00023% ≠ ,00050%
But I get it. Math is hard.
Using the puerile mathematical logic that you have applied here, the difference in global temperatures between now and 1800 and the number of pirates between now and 1800 proves categorically that piracy causes global cooling. Which is to say that your proof for the existence racism is dog shit, and surely even
you aren't so credulous as to believe that piracy produces global cooling.
You've made ZERO attempt to control for confounding variables. Here's an example of a confounding variable that could very well be the decisive difference: Consider the average gun; is it highly reflective, or non-reflective? In split-second judgement scenarios, high-contrast visual information is much easier to judge accurately than low-contrast visual information. Now, ask yourself, in a split second moment, is it easier to see a dark gun in the hand of a black guy, or a white guy?
This confounding variable could actually explain a lot of what's going on, and the only thing you could do about it is literally to change the colour of every gun in the world so it was shiny or light, so that cops could more easily spot a black guy holding one in his hands, and frankly once you're changing the colour of every gun in the world just to help the police decide who to shoot so you can maybe change the fate of 100 lives a year in a population of 42 million, you're in hysteria territory.
Until you understand how confounding variables work, and how one goes about controlling for them, you have no fucking business waving statistical anything in people's faces. Anyway, that's the stupidity, now for the dishonesty:
And cops shouldn't be killing anyone anyway.
Say, here's a thought... and work with me...
If we revisit the way law enforcement works, and maybe, just maybe send mental health folks to incidents like Tony's, a specialist would have managed the situation better than a bunch of hammers who only see nails.
Maybe, just maybe a mental health expert would have recognised a psychotic episode caused by being off medication and would have dealt with Tony accordingly, not, you know, with a knee in the neck.
Perhaps this response could be community specific.
Maybe, just maybe we should come up with a name for this approach... something like, "correct allocation of resources to provide situationally correct responses"
Nah, that's a bit heavy and won't catch on...
Now I'm thinking maybe three words max... something, something the police?
Help a brother out with an appropriate first word, pal.
Do you think a non-racial discussion of police violence towards innocent people can be had while statistically ignorant pukes like you are busy racialising every last fucking conversation with concepts like white fucking privilege? Anyone who tries to approach the situation by proposing solutions that work for people in general is accused of white supremacy. Look in the fucking mirror, you are your own worst enemy.