Fuck you! No, fuck you!!!

R

[)roi(]

Guest
Dave said:
It would be a lot easier to have a discussion if you actually understood what communism is, sugartits.
Click to expand...
You provided no proof to back up that claim; try disputing the facts I provided; or is real debate beyond your simple rhetoric.
 
R

[)roi(]

Guest
LD50 said:
If that's it, I have no problem
Click to expand...
No worries.

Some more for clarity for Dave and any others.
Three Systems of Plunder
The sincerity of those who advocate protectionism, socialism, and communism is not here questioned. Any writer who would do that must be influenced by a political spirit or a political fear. It is to be pointed out, however, that protectionism, socialism, and communism are basically the same plant in three different stages of its growth. All that can be said is that legal plunder is more visible in communism because it is complete plunder; and in protectionism because the plunder is limited to specific groups and industries.* Thus it follows that, of the three systems, socialism is the vaguest, the most indecisive, and, consequently, the most sincere stage of development.
But sincere or insincere, the intentions of persons are not here under question. In fact, I have already said that legal plunder is based partially on philanthropy, even though it is a false philanthropy.

Excerpt from: The Law, Frédéric Bastiat, published in 1849
Click to expand...
Plunder is plunder whether it's legislated or not; and no legislative plunder can occur without a big government with a big "stick" to threaten those selected for plunder. Liberty always dies in the shadow of that big government.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top