In that you have:
- entered into a discussion with no intention of offering supporting evidence. If you had intended to discuss rather than a drive-by shit-post, you'd have offered some evidence for Intelligent Design and/or god. You have avoided that;
- intentionally or not, conflated evolution with the creation of life. The god dunnit argument needs both the origin of self replicating molecules and evolution itself to have been "designed" by an "intelligent" god. Evolution holds true - and has been proven - with or without a creation myth/story. It does not need that plank upon which to stand, unlike the religious counterpart.
- misrepresented Dawkins by stating his fanciful conjecture, after repeatedly making the point that no one knows how life started, is an admission of the need for a creator
Sorry biometrics, will keep my comments more friendly but if scudsucker remains antagonistic it could derail.
I am asking you for evidence. If that seems to you to be antagonistic I suggest you take old Jaweh's advice in Matthew 5:39
Edit: bonus dishonesty in your previous post - hypocrisy. You complain that I am antagonistic but fail to note that you yourself are the person producing insults and deriding the "typical clueless militant evolutionists"