The totally cool no stress US election thread

[satanboy]

twatter twatter twatter
twatter twatter twatter
twatter twatter twatter
twatter twatter twatter
twatter twatter twatter
twatter twatter twatter

 

[jasong]

This thread is uncool and stressful, mainly because of *you know who*


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Dave]

This thread is uncool and stressful, mainly because of *you know who*


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's a pity a post like this can only be liked once.

 

[[)roi(]]

This thread is uncool and stressful, mainly because of *you know who*


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Grow up, threads are not echo chambers and neither is the US election.

A non triggered person with an opposing view would just post whatever they thought was relevant for them wrt the elections, instead of playing a juvenile insult game.

 

[biometrics]

juvenile insult game

Mmm, you make yourself guilty of this too.

 

[[)roi(]]

Mmm, you make yourself guilty of this too.

...and you would just ignore the insults?

Call it what you will; often the best medicine for those that hurl insults instead of debate is returning their vitriol. Plus remember who started the insults.

 

[Dave]

Plus remember who started the insults.

First post in the thread with insults:

Another thread full of TDS.
November is going to be entertaining watching all the communists lose their shit.

 

[Dave]

Second post in the thread with insults

It's almost as if they know they're dealing with a bunch of triggered morons.

 

[[)roi(]]

First post in the thread with insults:

...and you took that as a PERSONAL insult because?

• You associate with the group who'd be suffering from TDS?
• You associate with communists?

Second post in the thread with insults

Same question?

• You associate with the group who were triggered to riot, loot, burn, .. their cities?

My posts were generic; the fact that you associated yourself with that is your problem, not mine -- you made this personal I did not.

 

[Dave]

...and you took that as a PERSONAL insult because?

• You associate with the group who'd be suffering from TDS?
• You associate with communists?

Same question?

• You associate with the group who were triggered to riot, loot, burn, .. their cities?

My posts were generic; the fact that you associated yourself with that is your problem, not mine -- you made this personal I did not.

I didn't take any personal insult, I'm simply showing the first insults posted in the thread as you appear to have written a less than truthful statement.

 

[[)roi(]]

I didn't take any personal insult, I'm simply showing the first insults posted in the thread as you appear to have written a less than truthful statement.

Oh, ok so it wasn't an insult then?
If you fall into the group that is classified as plagued by TDS and you're a communist, then it's not an insult -- it's an acknowledgement.

Similarly the group that loots, riots, burns, etc... you're either feel you're part of that group and its an acknowledgement or you don't associate with that group and it's still not an insult.

 

[EADC]

 

[[)roi(]]

View attachment 6346

Nope...
That term was created by the right; not the left; hence the correct defintion is:

TDS is an acronym for Trump Derangement Syndrome, a term applied to people who express deep loathing and fear of President Donald Trump. It's usually used by Trump supporters for liberals.

...and worse if you're definition was "correct" then my statement should not have offended @Dave because then it'd be in reference to conservatives -- but it triggered @Dave... strange eh?

Plus your attempt to redefine it would be equivalent to me redefining BLM as Burn, Loot, and Murder; although that one sounds rather appropriate.

 

[Dave]

Oh, ok so it wasn't an insult then?
If you fall into the group that is classified as plagued by TDS and you're a communist, then it's not an insult -- it's an acknowledgement.

Similarly the group that loots, riots, burns, etc... you're either feel you're part of that group and its an acknowledgement or you don't associate with that group and it's still not an insult.

Yes, you were insulting, however I just think you're a funny joke, a sort of twisted combination of David Duke and Eugene Terre'Blanche so it didn't personally bother me. Just because I laughed at your inanity/stupidity doesn't mean it wasn't an insult to others.

 

[[)roi(]]

Yes, you were insulting, however I just think you're a funny joke, a sort of twisted combination of David Duke and Eugene Terre'Blanche so it didn't personally bother me. Just because I laughed at your inanity/stupidity doesn't mean it wasn't an insult to others.

Nope... wrong again... apparently you missed it the last time I corrected you.

The Nazis were socialists, and the Democrats are socialists, and EFF are socialists and ANC is socialist....
...and what do they all share in common?

• Marxist ideology
• Racism (identity politics)
• Corruption
• ...

David Duke votes for Democrats ; no different to the Nazis. and Eugene Terre'Blanche loved big government with its racist rules; no different to all socialists. Socialist policies are always focused on race; hence identity politics is such a big ticket policy item with Democrats; the same applies to Malema and Ramaphosa in South Africa

i.e. race matters to racists. Whereas conservatives incl. me don't give a shit what somebody's race is; where they come from and how their accents sound when they speak e.g. English... and we certainly don't like big government at all.

Hitler loved big government, used identity politics to create racial divisions, and took it to the ultimate atrocious end that Marx and Engels debated in their letters i.e. socialists are justifiably racist and genocide is justifiable. China does exactly the same -- same rotten ideology, same rotten result.

 

[Dave]

Nope... wrong again... apparently you missed it the last time I corrected you.

The Nazis were socialists, and the Democrats are socialists, and EFF are socialists and ANC is socialist....
...and what do they all share in common?

• Marxist ideology
• Racism (identity politics)
• Corruption
• ...

David Duke votes for Democrats ; no different to the Nazis. and Eugene Terre'Blanche loved big government with its rules; no different to all socialists. Socialist policies are always focused on race; hence identity politics is such a big ticket policy item with Democrats; the same applies to Malema and Ramaphosa in South Africa

i.e. race matters to racists. Whereas conservatives incl. me don't give a shit what somebody's race is; where they come from and how their accents sound when they speak e.g. English... and we certainly don't like big government at all.

Hitler loved big government, used identity politics to create racial divisions, and took it to the ultimate atrocious end that Marx and Engels debated in their letters i.e. socialists are justifiably racist and genocide is justifiable. China does exactly the same -- same rotten ideology, same rotten result.

You definitely come over as a mix of David Duke, Eugene Terre'Blanche and maybe even a touch of Adolf...

 

[[)roi(]]

In the American context; racists don't create a party alongside black slaves to free all slaves, including fighting and winning war against the Democrat slave owners to free the slaves; then create laws to treat everyone the same, irrespective of their race, color or creed. Nor do they write and enact laws to give women the right to vote (Democrats opposed that), nor do they fight against Jim Crow (Apartheid style) laws; which the Democrat created and enacted, nor do they abolish those racist laws and finally provide blacks the right to vote -- again not one Democrat supported that; they all opposed it.

History proves Democrats are the real racists. There was no "big switch". If you want to prove me wrong; then name who in the congress switched and when. Remember the full American history is available online, so if you believe that lie, then prove it.

In SA context; Democrats and their Jim Crow laws, sound exactly like the Eugene Terre'Blanche types who created Apartheid -- same rotten ideology and love of big government.

 

[Dave]

In the American context; racists don't create a party alongside black slaves to free all slaves, including fighting and winning war against the Democrat slave owners; then create laws to treat everyone the same, irrespective of their race, color or creed. Nor do they write and enact laws to give women the right to vote (Democrats opposed that), nor do they fight against Jim Crow (Apartheid style) laws; which the Democrat created and enacted, nor do they abolish those racist laws and finally provide blacks the right to vote -- again not one Democrat supported that; they all opposed it.

Do you have a white hood or do you prefer to keep it a bit more anonymous?

 

[[)roi(]]

Do you have a white hood or do you prefer to keep it a bit more anonymous?

Shame... leftists are always trying to blame others for their atrocious history and rotten ideology; you never debate facts; because facts are not on your side.

Meet a real KKK guy; friend of Biden, Obama, Clinton, etc. All democrats btw. KKK after all was created to attack the Republicans.


In your case I think you're just a brainwashed juvenile; if I'm wrong then congratulations you're a certified moron.

 

[Dave]

Ah, there we go again, the forum's resident racist back to his idiotic insults.