Coronavirus COVID-19 News specific to South Africa

biometrics

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2019
Messages
10,332
Here's some news you probably haven't heard about Hydroxychloroquine.

There is evidence that hydroxychloroquine DOES work to combat Covid-19.
Firstly, here is a study all the way back in 2005 that shows promise.

Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread

Then here is a trial done in 2020 that shows 100% success rate.
An Effective Treatment for Coronavirus (COVID-19)

The peer-reviewed study.

Here is a webpage dedicated to it.

Open-Data Repository on hydroxychloroquine


Here is an article from the International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy on hydroxychloroquine.

If you know someone that has Covid and is not doing well, consider getting them to take hydroxychloroquine, it cannot hurt if you (not sure about pregnant women, consult your doctor) take the right dose, don't over medicate, people have been taking it for 50 years.

And guess what hydroxychloroquine is cheap.


Urgh, not this again. Feel free to take it please. We won't.
 

SoldierMan

Active Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Messages
456
Urgh, not this again. Feel free to take it please. We won't.

Hahahaha because scientific studies suck right....

I guess they should just rely on bio and Dave's gut feel to treat diseases from now on :D

Hydroxy is part of the Chinese's Covid treatment, and guess what they have some of the lowest death rates in the world. Could it be connected? Nah never. And the 2005 study, we'll just ignore that. And the people that all recovered 100% we'll ignore that, and the ISAC studies, we'll just ignore that.

But heck yeah we'll trust, without question, vaccines that have had no long term studies done on them. We trust like sheep those even though Anti-body Dependent Enhancement has been shown in past failed vaccine trials in regards to SARS-CoV. But we don't care about that, we blindly follow. Heck yeah, we'll take anything that big pharma pushes even untested!!!! Give it to us!!!

What is it about hydroxy that you object to? Let me guess, Trump promoted so you guys had a kneejerk reaction to it based on that, right?
 

biometrics

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2019
Messages
10,332
Hahahaha because scientific studies suck right....

I guess they should just rely on bio and Dave's gut feel to treat diseases from now on :D

Hydroxy is part of the Chinese's Covid treatment, and guess what they have some of the lowest death rates in the world. Could it be connected? Nah never. And the 2005 study, we'll just ignore that. And the people that all recovered 100% we'll ignore that, and the ISAC studies, we'll just ignore that.

But heck yeah!! we'll trust, without question, vaccines that have had no long term studies done on them. We trust like sheep those even though Anti-body Dependent Enhancement has been shown in past failed vaccine trials in regards to SARS-CoV. But we don't care about that, we blindly follow.

What is it about hydroxy that you object to? Let me guess, Trump promoted so you guys had a kneejerk reaction to it based on that, right?
Well Trump is a moron.
 

SoldierMan

Active Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Messages
456
Well Trump is a moron.

Is that seriously your response? If so, I suggest you look in the mirror then..... eish.

You put all your faith in vaccines that have not been tested long term, as opposeed to a drug that has proven safe and effective.

Remember past vaccines have failed because of Anti-body Dependent Enhancement, if you don't know what that is look it up, it's very relevant, past vaccine attempts for SARS-CoV for example KILLED the primate subjects, the same sort of vaccines that are being rolled out now.

We have no long term data on these vaccines, that is the bottom line.

But hey big pharma rocks right and would never release anything harmful!
 

biometrics

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2019
Messages
10,332
Overstrand active cases (Kleinmond, Hermanus, Stanford and Gansbaai)

27 Nov 41
29 Nov 64
7 Dec 98
9 Dec 122
11 Dec 138
14 Dec 207
17 Dec 287
18 Dec 314
21 Dec 376
23 Dec 481
24 Dec 559
28 Dec 661
30 Dec 623
31 Dec 748
4 Jan 733
6 Jan 678
8 Jan 734
11 Jan 507
14 Jan 656
18 Jan 759
20 Jan 511
22 Jan 482
25 Jan 478

AF0100A6-CBD1-407B-80B8-33105ADCE01D.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Dave

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2020
Messages
7,621
Location
the sunlit uplands of Utopia
Yes, if you bothered to read any of the links I posted you would have seen that. Instead, ignorance reigns.

Can you point out where in which link?

I know you like to post shit and then run around like a pigeon on a chess board but what you need to show in your link is verifiable proof that:
(1) Hydroxy is part of the Chinese's Covid treatment, and guess what (2) they have some of the lowest death rates in the world.

So point out where and which link has independent verifiable proof of (1) and (2), mainly point 2, if you want to concentrate on just one of them.
 

bigAl-sa

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 10, 2020
Messages
788
Location
Dros


:oops:
The samrc are misinterpreting their own model. This happens when medical doctors try to be scientists.

This paragraph is a shocker:
These have been scaled up to estimate the actual number of deaths by accounting for the people who are not on the population register and the under-registration of deaths.

Their model is based on two years worth of data, and I have no idea how you get a statistically significant model based on two data sets (basically two data points per week).
 

SoldierMan

Active Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Messages
456
Can you point out where in which link?

I know you like to post shit and then run around like a pigeon on a chess board but what you need to show in your link is verifiable proof that:


So point out where and which link has independent verifiable proof of (1) and (2), mainly point 2, if you want to concentrate on just one of them.
It's the An Effective Treatment for Coronavirus (COVID-19) link.

Scroll down to Treatment Guidelines from China and look for point number 4. You will find it there because I like to chit post. As opposed to you who just makes judgement calls (on life and death no less) based on nothing but total ignorance on a subject (y)

As for the deaths. If you watch and TV or follow any news at all you will know that China's deaths are very low. A quick google says they have 4636 total deaths. Again you seem completely ignorant on a topic yet pretend to have knowledge on it and tell other they know nothing when you don't even take the time to read the links that were provided. Look in the mirror brat, you're an idiot.
 

biometrics

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2019
Messages
10,332
It's the An Effective Treatment for Coronavirus (COVID-19) link.

Scroll down to Treatment Guidelines from China and look for point number 4. You will find it there because I like to chit post. As opposed to you who just makes judgement calls (on life and death no less) based on nothing but total ignorance on a subject (y)

As for the deaths. If you watch and TV or follow any news at all you will know that China's deaths are very low. A quick google says they have 4636 total deaths. Again you seem completely ignorant on a topic yet pretend to have knowledge on it and tell other they know nothing when you don't even take the time to read the links that were provided. Look in the mirror brat, you're an idiot.
You do know that China's lockdowns are orders of magnitude stricter than the west, right? They also test whole cities in a go.
 

SoldierMan

Active Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Messages
456
You do know that China's lockdowns are orders of magnitude stricter than the west, right? They also test whole cities in a go.

Yes, still doesn't take away from the fact that they are using hydroxychloroquine as a treatment. They wouldn't be using it just for the heck of it, they obviously have found that it works.
 

Jings

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2020
Messages
3,777
Location
Gauteng
Yes, still doesn't take away from the fact that they are using hydroxychloroquine as a treatment. They wouldn't be using it just for the heck of it, they obviously have found that it works.

The Lancet did a study across 6 continents and the results were increased in-hospital deaths with hydroxychloroquine. In addition there is an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia. Why do you want to take a medicine that makes you sick?

Communist leaders lack confidence so are very sensitive to criticism. They only want to push news to make them look good, even if it's lies. Whistleblowers get locked in prison or mysteriously disappear.

 

SoldierMan

Active Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Messages
456
The Lancet did a study across 6 continents and the results were increased in-hospital deaths with hydroxychloroquine. In addition there is an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia. Why do you want to take a medicine that makes you sick?

Communist leaders lack confidence so are very sensitive to criticism. They only want to push news to make them look good, even if it's lies. Whistleblowers get locked in prison or mysteriously disappear.


Um you do realise that that study has been retracted right?

It's in big bold throughout the webpage RETRACTED.
 

SoldierMan

Active Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Messages
456
Communist leaders lack confidence so are very sensitive to criticism. They only want to push news to make them look good, even if it's lies. Whistleblowers get locked in prison or mysteriously disappear.

Yes I agree, I think China is a tyrannical regime. But they want their numbers to look good as well so why would they use hydroxychloroquine if it does nothing. Yes it is very cheap but it would still be a waste of money to use it if it had no effect.
 

Jings

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2020
Messages
3,777
Location
Gauteng
Yes I agree, I think China is a tyrannical regime. But they want their numbers to look good as well so why would they use hydroxychloroquine if it does nothing. Yes it is very cheap but it would still be a waste of money to use it if it had no effect.

Chinese scientists claim to have achieved good clinical efficacy using traditional herbs treatments too. Why are you not punting those?

 

SoldierMan

Active Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Messages
456
Chinese scientists claim to have achieved good clinical efficacy using traditional herbs treatments too. Why are you not punting those?


That's a ridiculous question, why would I?
I have only been looking into hydroxychloroquine, not Chinese herb treatments.
 
Top